Why Man City ‘114 out of 115’ headlines don’t tell the whole story

Another City charges story needs some justification after several days in which the subject has dominated the football headlines.

This one isn’t another attempt to predict a punishment, revisit Friday’s reports or second-guess an appeal. Instead, it concerns one of the numbers that has appeared repeatedly since the latest developments: 114 out of 115.

That figure has been widely used in coverage of the reported findings against City. Yet another number has also emerged, with The Guardian reporting that the final charge sheet contained 134 charges covering the period from 2009-10 to 2022-23.

So why is the case still universally known as the “115 charges” – and what should supporters make of the different figures?

Why Man City’s case is known as the 115 charges

When the Premier League announced its case against Man City in February 2023, its statement listed alleged breaches across numerous rules and seasons.

Those allegations were subsequently counted and became widely known as the 115 charges. The description stuck.

It has been used ever since as shorthand for a complicated case covering several different areas of Premier League regulation across a period of more than a decade.

Friday’s reporting added another layer. The Guardian reported that sources familiar with the outcome said City had been found guilty on almost all of more than 100 charges.

Other coverage of the case has referred to 114 out of 115. The Guardian, however, says the verdict followed a final charge sheet containing 134 charges.

Without the independent panel’s written findings being publicly available, attempting to reconcile those figures definitively would risk presenting assumptions as fact. What is clear is that the case isn’t one allegation repeated more than 100 times.

What are the Man City charges about?

The Premier League’s original statement set out allegations across several broad areas.

They included City’s alleged failure to provide accurate financial information, including information relating to revenue, sponsorship revenue, related parties and operating costs.

There were also allegations concerning the disclosure of manager and player remuneration, compliance with UEFA financial regulations, the Premier League’s profitability and sustainability rules and City’s cooperation with the league’s investigation.

City have consistently denied wrongdoing. As we’ve reported throughout the past few days, The Guardian says an independent panel has found City guilty on almost all of the charges.

City responded on Friday by saying the Premier League process “remains ongoing, with significant elements to be completed, and subject to strict confidentiality”. The panel’s written ruling has still not been published.

Why 114, 115 and 134 need some caution

For supporters who have followed this story since Thursday, that unpublished document is now central to understanding the numbers as well as the outcome itself.

It should eventually provide a proper breakdown of the allegations considered by the panel, its findings and the reasoning behind them. Until then, there is a limit to what can safely be concluded from “114 out of 115” alone.

The familiar 115 figure remains useful shorthand. The reported 134-charge final sheet suggests the case developed beyond the way it was originally counted and presented publicly.

That doesn’t make Friday’s reporting insignificant. Nor does it establish precisely how every charge should now be counted. It means the full breakdown isn’t yet available for supporters to examine themselves.

City are reported to be preparing an appeal, while debate has already moved towards possible sanctions, compensation claims from rival clubs and what the eventual outcome could mean for the club.

We’ve covered all of those strands separately over the past few days. This particular one is simpler. After years of calling this the 115 charges case, supporters are now seeing 114, 115 and 134 used in coverage of the same proceedings.

Until the written ruling becomes public, those figures need context rather than another definitive headline pretending the arithmetic is straightforward.

LIVE! Premier League 2026/27 News, Transfers, Updates & Viral Moments

Share

Gary is an experienced football journalist who has written for, among many others, BBC Sport and The Metro, and is now the editor of ReadEverton.com. He leads daily coverage of Everton news, transfers and analysis as part of the dave.sport network. He also writes for ReadManCity.com, ReadMotorsport and ReadNorwich within the same network. When not writing, he enjoys a nice cold pint of Guinness and trips to the cinema ... not always at the same time.

View all articles →

From our partners

Recommended across our network

related.